Thread

  1. 7.3.2 Regression Failures Worth Looking Into

    Thomas T. Thai <tom@minnesota.com> — 2003-03-29T21:32:09Z

    NetBSD 1.6 / Alpha (64-bit)
    Postgresql 7.3.2 & 7.4-dev
    gcc-3.2.2
    
    I compiled 7.4-dev and had success with all regression tests. However when
    I went back to 7.3.2, about 15 out of 89 tests failed.
    
    I'll be using 7.4-dev, but I'm wondering if it's worth it to the
    Postgresql community if I dig further to see why those tests failed;
    considering that obviously 7.4-dev fixed all of them.
    
    --
    Thomas T. Thai
    
    
    
  2. Re: 7.3.2 Regression Failures Worth Looking Into

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2003-03-29T23:29:06Z

    "Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com> writes:
    > NetBSD 1.6 / Alpha (64-bit)
    > Postgresql 7.3.2 & 7.4-dev
    > gcc-3.2.2
    
    > I compiled 7.4-dev and had success with all regression tests. However when
    > I went back to 7.3.2, about 15 out of 89 tests failed.
    
    Failed how?  Without looking at the diffs, it's impossible to evaluate
    the seriousness of the issue.
    
    > I'll be using 7.4-dev, but I'm wondering if it's worth it to the
    > Postgresql community if I dig further to see why those tests failed;
    > considering that obviously 7.4-dev fixed all of them.
    
    AFAIK there are not any portability enhancements in 7.4 that might
    explain such a difference. So the 7.3 results are interesting.  You
    should probably rule out pilot error though (does "select version()"
    confirm that you rebuilt with the newer compiler?)
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
  3. Re: 7.3.2 Regression Failures Worth Looking Into

    Thomas T. Thai <tom@minnesota.com> — 2003-03-30T04:20:47Z

    > "Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com> writes:
    >> NetBSD 1.6 / Alpha (64-bit)
    >> Postgresql 7.3.2 & 7.4-dev
    >> gcc-3.2.2
    >
    >> I compiled 7.4-dev and had success with all regression tests. However
    >> when I went back to 7.3.2, about 15 out of 89 tests failed.
    >
    > Failed how?  Without looking at the diffs, it's impossible to evaluate
    > the seriousness of the issue.
    
    I can send the diffs to you Tom, but it's too big to send to the list.
    Would that be ok with you?
    
    >> I'll be using 7.4-dev, but I'm wondering if it's worth it to the
    >> Postgresql community if I dig further to see why those tests failed;
    >> considering that obviously 7.4-dev fixed all of them.
    >
    > AFAIK there are not any portability enhancements in 7.4 that might
    > explain such a difference. So the 7.3 results are interesting.  You
    > should probably rule out pilot error though (does "select version()"
    > confirm that you rebuilt with the newer compiler?)
    
    template1=# select version();
                                       version
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     PostgreSQL 7.3.2 on alpha-unknown-netbsd1.6, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 3.2.2
    (1 row)
    
    foo=# select version();
                                        version
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     PostgreSQL 7.4devel on alpha-unknown-netbsd1.6, compiled by GCC cc (GCC)
    3.2.2
    (1 row)
    
    
    Thomas T. Thai