Re: ALTER TABLE...ALTER COLUMN vs inheritance
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-04T14:57:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Catalog NOT NULL constraints
- e056c557aef4 16.0 landed
Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> writes: > Consider the following workflow: > CREATE TABLE foo(id integer NOT NULL, val text NOT NULL); > CREATE TABLE foo2(another_id integer NOT NULL) INHERITS(foo); > Now someone decides he doesn't want the NOT NULL constraint on the > inherited column "val" anymore: > ALTER TABLE foo2 ALTER COLUMN val DROP NOT NULL; Yeah, this is a known issue. The ALTER should be rejected, but it is not, because we don't have enough infrastructure to notice that the constraint is inherited and logically can't be dropped. I think the consensus was that the way to fix this (along with some other problems) is to start representing NOT NULL constraints in pg_constraint, turning attnotnull into just a bit of denormalization for performance. regards, tom lane