Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
"Inoue,
Hiroshi" <h-inoue@dream.email.ne.jp>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi@winpg.jp>,
"Tsunakawa,
Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: 2020-11-21T18:13:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > Indeed, this could go. There is a recursive call for views, but in > order to maintain compatibility with that we can just remove one > function and move the second to use a regclass as argument, like the > attached, while removing setLastTid(). Any thoughts? Considering that we're preserving this only for backwards compatibility, I doubt that changing the signature is a good idea. It maybe risks breaking something, and the ODBC driver is hardly going to notice any improved ease-of-use. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Remove catalog function currtid()
- 7b94e999606e 14.0 landed