Re: Should AT TIME ZONE be volatile?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Shay Rojansky <roji@roji.org>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-11T14:52:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert per-index collation version tracking feature.
- ec4831470826 14.0 cited
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I'm not really convinced that ICU is better, either. I think it's more > that it isn't used as much. Well, at least ICU has a notion of attaching versions to collations. How mindful they are of bumping the version number when necessary remains to be seen. But the POSIX locale APIs don't even offer the opportunity to get it right. > I don't have any constructive proposal for what to do about any of > this. It sure is frustrating, though. Yup. If we had reliable ways to detect changes in this sort of environment-supplied data, maybe we could do something about it (a la the work that's been happening on attaching collation versions to indexes). But personally I can't summon the motivation to work on that, when ICU is the *only* such infrastructure that offers readily program-readable versioning. regards, tom lane