Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-12-24T15:32:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: >> CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE blah INHERITS myhugetable; > I don't think you can have your temp table inherit from a real table. Bear in mind also that this notion of a GLOBAL TEMP table has less than nothing to do with what the standard says a GLOBAL TEMP table is. You can't argue for the idea by claiming it increases our standards compliance, because it actually is moving even further away. The spec says that a temp table is a table that exists but starts empty in every session, ie, data inserted by one session is not visible to any other session. The GLOBAL/LOCAL choice does not affect this, it actually just governs visibility of the table within different modules (a concept we don't have at all). An ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED switch might have some merit, but please don't muddy the waters by confusing this with temp-table status. regards, tom lane