Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-12-24T15:32:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>> CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE blah INHERITS myhugetable;

> I don't think you can have your temp table inherit from a real table.

Bear in mind also that this notion of a GLOBAL TEMP table has less than
nothing to do with what the standard says a GLOBAL TEMP table is.  You
can't argue for the idea by claiming it increases our standards
compliance, because it actually is moving even further away.  The spec
says that a temp table is a table that exists but starts empty in every
session, ie, data inserted by one session is not visible to any other
session.  The GLOBAL/LOCAL choice does not affect this, it actually just
governs visibility of the table within different modules (a concept we
don't have at all).

An ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED switch might have some merit, but
please don't muddy the waters by confusing this with temp-table status.

			regards, tom lane