Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-06T23:29:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: >> If we're going to start putting in changes like this, I'd suggest that >> we try and target something like September for 9.1 to actually be >> released. Playing with the lock management isn't something we want to >> be doing lightly and I think we definitely need to have serious testing >> of this, similar to what has been done for the SSI changes, before we're >> going to be able to release it. > Completely aside from the issue at hand, aren't we looking at a > September release by now anyway (assuming we have to void late > July/August as we usually do)? Very possibly. So if we add this in, we're talking November or December instead of September. You can't argue that July/August will be lost time for one development path but not another. regards, tom lane