Re: Using per-transaction memory contexts for storing decoded tuples
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Shlok Kyal
<shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-10-10T15:04:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2024/10/04 3:32, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > Yes, but as for this macro specifically, I thought that it might be > better to keep it, since it avoids breaking extension unnecessarily > and it seems to be natural to have it as an option for slab context. If the macro has value, I'm okay with leaving it as is. Are you planning to post the patch? Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
-
Reduce memory block size for decoded tuple storage to 8kB.
- 1b9b6cc3456b 18.0 landed
- eef9cc4dc28f 17.1 landed
- 05e982cdc4df 16.5 landed
- 4a675f31868a 15.9 landed
- 5c1ed0a51681 14.14 landed
- cb988b04d063 13.17 landed
- 53fa68b3bc3a 12.21 landed
-
Generational memory allocator
- a4ccc1cef5a0 11.0 cited