Re: doc: create table improvements
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>,
jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>,
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-16T15:01:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: declutter CREATE TABLE synopsis.
- a6d26e0fb29b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove support for unlogged on partitioned tables
- e2bab2d79204 18.0 cited
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: > It's simply markup defined by DocBook to indicate what type the content to be > replaced is, in this case a parameter. While it might not make any visual > difference in our rendering, someone might be rendering the docs in another way > where it does show a difference (like using a different font or decoration to > differentiate parameters from functions etc). That's the theory anyway. But we've been so massively inconsistent in whether to use class markup or not (no doubt exactly because it makes no difference for us) that I would expect a rendering where it does make a difference to look really awful. regards, tom lane