Re: BUG #16997: parameter server_encoding's category problem

Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for reporting. All the internal parameters that can't be set by
> the users are under the "Preset Options" category. Likewise,
> server_encoding, lc_collate and lc_ctype should also be listed under
> the "Preset Options" category, even though there is a "Client
> Connection Defaults / Locale and Formatting" category, which has user
> configurable parameters. For instance, since the in_hot_standby is an
> internal parameter, it is specified under the "Preset Options" even
> though there is a "Replication / Standby Servers" category which
> mentions all the user configurable parameters.

> Therefore, I would say that the documentation is correct but the code
> is not. Attached patch should fix this.

Hm.  I did some more careful checks (by comparing the pg_settings
view's output to the SGML docs) and found a boatload of additional
misclassifications.  The most egregious being that somebody had
decided to invent a new sub-heading Write Ahead Log / Recovery,
but didn't bother to add a corresponding enum value; so the variables
in that sub-section were all misclassified (and not even all in
the same way).

I also discovered that postgresql.conf.sample wasn't all that well
in sync with the docs.  It mostly agreed with the docs as to
classifications, but the ordering of individual options didn't
agree so well.  I think this is a consequence of various people
having arbitrarily alphabetized the doc entries without making
postgresql.conf.sample match.  I can see no excuse for them not
to match, though.

Using the same assumption that the docs represent our best ideas
in this area, the attached 0001 makes the GUC code and the sample
file agree with the docs.

I also think we should do 0002, which removes the group-level
enum values for those categories where we have sub-categories.
The group-level enum values seem to me to just be an attractive
bug-encouraging nuisance (there is indeed one place in 0001 that
changes a GUC that was misclassified at the top level).  Plus
they result in translators having to do extra work.

There are a couple of loose ends yet:

* I notice that these GUCs appear in the view, but if they're
documented anywhere it's not in config.sgml:

 transaction_deferrable                 | Client Connection Defaults / Statement Behavior
 transaction_isolation                  | Client Connection Defaults / Statement Behavior
 transaction_read_only                  | Client Connection Defaults / Statement Behavior

Should we add entries for them?  If not, should we maybe move them
to the UNGROUPED category (and then make them GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL),
like other special GUCs such as "role"?  I'm a bit inclined to the
latter, since they aren't supposed to be used in the same way as
ordinary GUCs.

* The code's names for the categories do not match up all that
well with the section headings in config.sgml, eg we have
Query Tuning in guc.c and Query Planning in the docs.  Should we
try to sync that?

> While on this, I also adjusted some of the wordings for the other
> "Preset Options".

I agree that the preset options should uniformly use the phrasing
"Shows ...", but I thought your proposals here were mostly too
verbose.

			regards, tom lane