Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-01-28T15:31:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > When I'm testing the new patch, I found "ALTER LARGE OBJECT" command > returns "ALTER LARGEOBJECT" tag. Should it be "ALTER LARGE(space)OBJECT" > instead? As I remember, we had decided not to use LARGEOBJECT > (without a space) in user-visible messages, right? The command tag should match the actual command. If the command name is "ALTER LARGE OBJECT", the command tag should be too. This is independent of phraseology we might choose in error messages (though I agree I don't like "largeobject" in those either). regards, tom lane