Re: pg_trgm
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, ishii@sraoss.co.jp, andres@anarazel.de, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, teodor@sigaev.ru
Date: 2010-05-28T00:51:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: > Or you could just #undef KEEPONLYALNUM in trgm.h. But I'm not sure > this is the right thing for you. It's not a practical solution for people working with prebuilt Postgres versions, which is most people. I don't object to finding a way to provide a "not-space" behavior instead of an "is-alnum" behavior, but as noted upthread a GUC isn't the right way. How do you feel about a new set of functions with an additional flag argument of some sort? regards, tom lane