Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Jay Levitt <jay.levitt@gmail.com>, Alex <ash@commandprompt.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-18T02:30:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because >> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*... > I think this is a point worth serious thought. Indeed. The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla (because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it. At least some of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages such things. So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?". Maybe we can't :-(. regards, tom lane