Re: Bug tracker tool we need

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Jay Levitt <jay.levitt@gmail.com>, Alex <ash@commandprompt.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-18T02:30:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because
>> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*...

> I think this is a point worth serious thought.

Indeed.  The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla
(because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it.  At least some
of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning
bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages
such things.  So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use
Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?".
Maybe we can't :-(.

			regards, tom lane