Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
brian.williams@mayalane.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-11-08T15:19:20Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Hmm. Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation > in a parenthical comment: > This is particularly handy when restoring a > <literal>pg_dump</literal> dump: the dump script should be restored in a > pristine database (one where no user-defined objects exist and where > system objects have not been altered), to ensure that one recreates > the correct contents of the dumped database, without conflicting > with objects that might have been added to > <literal>template1</literal> later on. So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical definition for the first use? Works for me. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Remove the word "virgins" for documentation
- 6ae4d271879b 13.0 landed