Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, brian.williams@mayalane.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-11-08T15:19:20Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Hmm.  Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation
> in a parenthical comment:

>     This is particularly handy when restoring a
>     <literal>pg_dump</literal> dump: the dump script should be restored in a
>     pristine database (one where no user-defined objects exist and where
>     system objects have not been altered), to ensure that one recreates
>     the correct contents of the dumped database, without conflicting
>     with objects that might have been added to
>     <literal>template1</literal> later on.

So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical
definition for the first use?  Works for me.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Remove the word "virgins" for documentation