Re: Wierd context-switching issue on Xeon

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, lutzeb@aeccom.com, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Date: 2004-04-20T00:01:56Z
Lists: pgsql-performance

Attachments

Here is a test case.  To set up, run the "test_setup.sql" script once;
then launch two copies of the "test_run.sql" script.  (For those of
you with more than two CPUs, see whether you need one per CPU to make
trouble, or whether two test_runs are enough.)  Check that you get a
nestloops-with-index-scans plan shown by the EXPLAIN in test_run.

In isolation, test_run.sql should do essentially no syscalls at all once
it's past the initial ramp-up.  On a machine that's functioning per
expectations, multiple copies of test_run show a relatively low rate of
semop() calls --- a few per second, at most --- and maybe a delaying
select() here and there.

What I actually see on Josh's client's machine is a context swap storm:
"vmstat 1" shows CS rates around 170K/sec.  strace'ing the backends
shows a corresponding rate of semop() syscalls, with a few delaying
select()s sprinkled in.  top(1) shows system CPU percent of 25-30
and idle CPU percent of 16-20.

I haven't bothered to check how long the test_run query takes, but if it
ends while you're still examining the behavior, just start it again.

Note the test case assumes you've got shared_buffers set to at least
1000; with smaller values, you may get some I/O syscalls, which will
probably skew the results.

			regards, tom lane