Re: pg_dump: bug?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-02-02T05:29:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes: > Now, is this a bug? Good question. I don't think this is the only example of a non-self-consistent situation that could arise after a series of ALTER commands; I'm not sure that we can or should try to solve every one. However, it does seem that a superuser should be able to create databases on behalf of users who can't themselves do so. So I'd say that we need a "CREATE DATABASE foo WITH OWNER bar" option. Then pg_dumpall should emit such critters rather than the circumlocution it uses now. regards, tom lane