Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>

From: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-29T11:05:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>         Is there an argument for back-patching this?
> 
> 
> Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
> 
> 
> I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take
> your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it? 

I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom
and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you
decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item?


Michael

-- 
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax:  +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael.banck@credativ.de

credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer




Commits

  1. Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates