Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
From: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Jim Nasby
<Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-29T11:05:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Is there an argument for back-patching this? > > > Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did. > > > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take > your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it? I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item? Michael -- Michael Banck Projektleiter / Senior Berater Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171 Fax: +49 2166 9901-100 Email: michael.banck@credativ.de credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Commits
-
Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates
- bd34e7f19b40 9.4.12 landed
- 2843d5d657be 9.5.7 landed
- b88b929a7071 9.6.3 landed