Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-11-17T21:53:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > What's the problem with that? If you already have the VM buffer pinned > (which should be possible if we keep the VM buffer in a longer-lived > structure), then doing the test is almost as cheap as checking > PD_ALL_VISIBLE, because you don't need any locks. Really? What about race conditions? Specifically, I think what you suggest is likely to be unreliable on machines with weak memory ordering. Consider possibility that someone else just changed the VM bit. Getting a lock ensures synchronization. (Yeah, it's possible that we could use some primitive cheaper than a lock ... but it's not going to be free.) regards, tom lane