Re: pgindent run next week?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-05-17T17:47:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2019-05-17 10:29:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Also, how do people feel about adopting the function prototype >> indenting change discussed in >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug%40mail.gmail.com > I think it'd be a huge improvement. Yeah, that's probably the biggest remaining bug/issue in pgindent. > Would we want to also apply this to the back branches to avoid spurious > conflicts? I dunno, how far back are you thinking? I've occasionally wished we could reindent all the back branches to match HEAD, but realistically, people carrying out-of-tree patches would scream. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Initial pgindent run for v12.
- be76af171cdb 12.0 landed