Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "J. R. Nield" <jrnield@usol.com>
Cc: Richard Tucker <richt@multera.com>,
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-02T20:01:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"J. R. Nield" <jrnield@usol.com> writes: > The predicate for files we MUST (fuzzy) copy is: > File exists at start of backup && File exists at end of backup Right, which seems to me to negate all these claims about needing a (horribly messy) way to read uncommitted system catalog entries, do blind reads, etc. What's wrong with just exec'ing tar after having done a checkpoint? (In particular, I *strongly* object to using the buffer manager at all for reading files for backup. That's pretty much guaranteed to blow out buffer cache. Use plain OS-level file reads. An OS directory search will do fine for finding what you need to read, too.) regards, tom lane