Re: join over 12 tables takes 3 secs to plan
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
From: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>
To: <hlapp@gmx.net>
Cc: <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-01-02T21:21:28Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hilmar Lapp said: > As an added note, appreciating that query optimization is a difficult > problem, and I do think PostgreSQL is a great product. Having said > that, I've written 16-table joins for Oracle and always found them to > plan within a second or two, so that's why I thought there's nothing > special about the query I posted ... I'm not saying this to be bashful > about PostgreSQL, but rather to suggest that apparently there are ways > to do it pretty fast. I'm sure there is room for improvement -- either by adding additional heuristics to the default optimizer, by improving GEQO, or by implementing another method for non-exhaustive search for large join queries (there are several ways to handle large join queries, only one of which uses a genetic algorithm: see "Query Optimization" (Ioannidis, 1996) for a good introductory survey). If you'd like to take a shot at improving it, let me know if I can be of any assistance :-) Cheers, Neil