Horton

Re: pg_walsummary, Character-not-present-in-option

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-09-30T16:08:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuusuke@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed?

Looks like that to me too.  Pushed.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Remove incorrect entries in pg_walsummary's getopt_long call.