Re: pg_migrator issues
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-07T05:32:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On mn, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it >> seems the most minimal solution. I spelled it --only-analyze and just >> posted the reason and patch. > I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have > other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only. I > personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze. In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only, and nobody has complained about that. I concur with Peter that this spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else. Perhaps we could compromise by calling it "--no-vacuum", instead? regards, tom lane