Re: pg_migrator issues

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-07T05:32:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On mn, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it
>> seems the most minimal solution.  I spelled it --only-analyze and just
>> posted the reason and patch.

> I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have
> other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only.  I
> personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze.

In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only,
and nobody has complained about that.  I concur with Peter that this
spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else.

Perhaps we could compromise by calling it "--no-vacuum", instead?

			regards, tom lane