Re: Improving RLS planning

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-01-18T14:36:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.  Attached is an updated patch that I believe
>> addresses all of the review comments so far.  The code is unchanged from
>> v2, but I improved the README, some comments, and the regression tests.

> I've reviewed your updates and they answer all of my comments and I
> appreciate the EC regression tests you added.

> I also agree with Dean's down-thread suggested regression test change.

Thanks for reviewing --- I'll do something with that test case and
push it.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

  1. Improve RLS planning by marking individual quals with security levels.