Re: PostgreSQL-related legal question
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan de Visser <jan@de-visser.net>,
"pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-03-11T23:53:46Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com> writes: > One of my sons was hired by Google last year after spending the past > several years working on various open-source projects, it took 2 days of > back-and-forth with Google's legal department before he was satisfied with > the restrictions in their offer. FWIW, I had a pretty similar discussion with Salesforce when I joined them. If you're looking at an employment agreement with verbiage like this, get them to modify it. They're probably hiring you in part *because* you are a contributor to PG, so they should be willing to bend their standard language for you. If not, maybe you don't want that job. regards, tom lane