Horton

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-26T19:21:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 4/26/20 1:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> There is a small problem with getting this to work in the webstyle
> HTML: somebody decided it would be a great idea to have a global
> override on paragraph margin-bottom settings.  For the purposes of
> this test I just deleted that from main.css, but I suppose we want
> some more-nuanced solution in reality.

I have to see why that is. I traced it back to the original "bring doc
styles up to modern website" patch (66798351) and there is missing
context. Anyway, I'd like to test it before a wholesale removal (there
is often a strong correlation between "!important" and "hack", so I'll
want to further dive into it).

I'll have some time to play around with the CSS tonight.

Jonathan

Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.