Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, david@fetter.org, aidan@highrise.ca, stark@mit.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-06-13T02:30:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Wakeup WALWriter as needed for asynchronous commit performance.

Attachments

On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 21:49 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> > v8 attached
> 
> v10 attached.
> 
> This patch covers all the valid concerns discussed and has been
> extensively tested.
> 
> I expect to commit this in about 24 hours, so last call for comments
> please or say if you need more time to review.

I have made an attempt to merge this with master. This patch is not
meant to be the next version, and I have not made a real effort to be
sure this was a safe merge. I am just hoping this saves Simon some of
the tedious portions of the merge, and offers a reference point to see
where his merge differs from mine.

In the meantime, I'm looking at the original v10 patch against master as
it existed when Simon posted the patch.

I'd like to see checksums take part in the June commitfest.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis