Re: Drongo vs. 9.4 initdb TAP test

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 07:24:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This test is passing in the newer branches --- evidently due to
>> the 9.5-era commit 1a629c1b1, which removed this TAP script's
>> dependency on "rm -rf".  So we should either back-patch that
>> commit into 9.4 or undo whatever configuration change caused
>> drongo to try to run more tests.  I favor the former.

> I would prefer simply removing the dependency of rm -rf in the tests,
> even if that's for a short time as 9.4 is EOL in two months.

I'd vote for back-patching 1a629c1b1 as-is, or is that what you meant?

> A back-patch applies without conflicts, and the tests are able to pass.
> Would you prefer doing it yourself?  I have not checked yet on
> Windows, better to make sure that it does not fail.

I don't have the ability to test it on Windows --- if you want to do that,
feel free to do so and push.

			regards, tom lane