Horton

Re: Draft release notes complete

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

View thread
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-05-10T17:29:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.

  2. Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.

  3. Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.

  4. Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a

On tor, 2012-05-10 at 09:55 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 5/10/12 9:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tor, 2012-05-10 at 10:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> The big take-away is that the release notes are mostly for blame and
> >> to designate a go-to person for feature problems, not for giving
> >> credit,
> > 
> > Then reviewers should be removed.
> 
> I disagree.  We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
> do more reviewing.  Giving credit is a big part of that.

Are you disagreeing with Bruce's premise, my logic, or the conclusion?