Horton

Re: Assorted typo fixes

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2024-01-03T05:56:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> 0010 is indeed the "correct" plural form for vertex I've known but
> "vertexes" is not wrong either.  Perhaps that's worth changing on
> consistency grounds?

Yeah.  A quick grep shows that we have 16 uses of "vertices" and
only this one of "vertexes".  It's not really wrong, but +1 for
making it match the others.

>     8)</literal>, must be identical.  It doesn't matter which representation
>     you choose to be the canonical one, so long as two equivalent values with
> -   different formattings are always mapped to the same value with the same
> +   different formatting are always mapped to the same value with the same
>     formatting.

> I am not sure about this one in 0011 though..  It also feels like this
> could be reworded completely.

I'd leave this alone, it's not wrong either.  If you want to propose
a complete rewording, do so; but that's not "misspelling" territory.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. doc: fix typo "vertexes" -> "vertices"

  2. Fix some typos

  3. jsonpath_exec: fix typo "absense" -> "absence"

  4. libpq: fix typo "occurences" -> "occurrences" in tests

  5. gist: fix typo "split(t)ed" -> "split"

  6. tsquery: fix typo "rewrited" -> "rewritten"

  7. Fix typos in comments and in one isolation test.

  8. *** empty log message ***