Thread
-
Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> — 2012-04-08T08:59:55Z
Hi, I recently wrote a plpgsql plugin. I wanted to enable the use of pgxs, to make it easier to compile the plugin, but I eventually found that I can't do that because the plpgsql.h file is not available in the include directory. I'm wondering if we shouldn't put the header files of plpgsql source code in the include directory. It would help compiling the PL/pgsql debugger, and profiler (and of course my own plugin). There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. Thanks. Regards. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2012-04-12T09:28:51Z
On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Hi, > > I recently wrote a plpgsql plugin. I wanted to enable the use of pgxs, > to make it easier to compile the plugin, but I eventually found that I > can't do that because the plpgsql.h file is not available in the include > directory. > > I'm wondering if we shouldn't put the header files of plpgsql source > code in the include directory. It would help compiling the PL/pgsql > debugger, and profiler (and of course my own plugin). Yep, I just bumped into this myself, while trying to make pldebugger module compilable with pgxs. > There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't > want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose the attached. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2012-04-12T13:59:43Z
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't >> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. > Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose > the attached. Shouldn't the new targets be marked .PHONY? regards, tom lane
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2012-04-12T16:28:44Z
On 12.04.2012 16:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't >>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. > >> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose >> the attached. > > Shouldn't the new targets be marked .PHONY? Umm ... <me reads up on what .PHONY means> ... yes, yes they should. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> — 2012-04-13T16:17:33Z
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:28 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently wrote a plpgsql plugin. I wanted to enable the use of pgxs, > > to make it easier to compile the plugin, but I eventually found that I > > can't do that because the plpgsql.h file is not available in the include > > directory. > > > > I'm wondering if we shouldn't put the header files of plpgsql source > > code in the include directory. It would help compiling the PL/pgsql > > debugger, and profiler (and of course my own plugin). > > Yep, I just bumped into this myself, while trying to make pldebugger > module compilable with pgxs. > > > There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't > > want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. > > Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose > the attached. > Sounds good to me. I would love to see this happening in 9.2. Thanks, Heikki. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2012-04-16T10:09:09Z
On 13.04.2012 19:17, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:28 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't >>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. >> >> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose >> the attached. > > Sounds good to me. I would love to see this happening in 9.2. Ok, committed. I fixed the .PHONY line as Tom pointed out, and changed MSVC install.pm to also copy the header file. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> — 2012-04-16T19:53:20Z
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 13:09 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 13.04.2012 19:17, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:28 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > >>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't > >>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. > >> > >> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose > >> the attached. > > > > Sounds good to me. I would love to see this happening in 9.2. > > Ok, committed. I fixed the .PHONY line as Tom pointed out, and changed > MSVC install.pm to also copy the header file. > Thanks. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> — 2012-04-17T04:56:13Z
2012/4/16 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>: > On 13.04.2012 19:17, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 12:28 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> >>> On 08.04.2012 11:59, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >>>> >>>> There could be a good reason which would explain why we can't (or don't >>>> want to) do this, but I don't see it right now. >>> >>> >>> Me neither, except a general desire to keep internals hidden. I propose >>> the attached. >> >> >> Sounds good to me. I would love to see this happening in 9.2. > > > Ok, committed. I fixed the .PHONY line as Tom pointed out, and changed MSVC > install.pm to also copy the header file. > Hello, it doesn't work for modules from contrib directory pavel ~/src/postgresql/contrib/check_plpgsql $ make gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g -fpic -I. -I. -I../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o check_plpgsql.o check_plpgsql.c check_plpgsql.c:16:21: fatal error: plpgsql.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Regards Pavel > > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2012-04-17T06:36:04Z
On 17.04.2012 07:56, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2012/4/16 Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>: >> Ok, committed. I fixed the .PHONY line as Tom pointed out, and changed MSVC >> install.pm to also copy the header file. > > Hello, > > it doesn't work for modules from contrib directory > > pavel ~/src/postgresql/contrib/check_plpgsql $ make > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels > -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing > -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g -fpic -I. -I. > -I../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o check_plpgsql.o > check_plpgsql.c > check_plpgsql.c:16:21: fatal error: plpgsql.h: No such file or directory > compilation terminated. Hmm, the makefile rule I added copies the plpgsql.h file to include/server directory when you do "make install". That makes the file available when you build with USE_PGXS=1, without access to the source tree, but doesn't change the situation when you build inside contrib. If you plop the module directly to contrib, I guess you'll have to do CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/src/pl/plpgsql/src That's what pldebugger has always done. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: Why can't I use pgxs to build a plpgsql plugin?
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> — 2012-04-17T07:12:41Z
2012/4/17 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>: > On 17.04.2012 07:56, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> 2012/4/16 Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>: >>> >>> Ok, committed. I fixed the .PHONY line as Tom pointed out, and changed >>> MSVC >>> install.pm to also copy the header file. >> >> >> Hello, >> >> it doesn't work for modules from contrib directory >> >> pavel ~/src/postgresql/contrib/check_plpgsql $ make >> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith >> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels >> -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing >> -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g -fpic -I. -I. >> -I../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o check_plpgsql.o >> check_plpgsql.c >> check_plpgsql.c:16:21: fatal error: plpgsql.h: No such file or directory >> compilation terminated. > > > Hmm, the makefile rule I added copies the plpgsql.h file to include/server > directory when you do "make install". That makes the file available when you > build with USE_PGXS=1, without access to the source tree, but doesn't change > the situation when you build inside contrib. > > If you plop the module directly to contrib, I guess you'll have to do > > CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/src/pl/plpgsql/src > > That's what pldebugger has always done. > ook, thank you Pavel > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com