Horton

Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

View thread
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Cc: Robert Haas *EXTERN* <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-08T21:56:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On tor, 2012-03-08 at 10:49 +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Actually, I did when I reviewed the patch the first time round.
> I think that the checks implemented are clearly good and useful,
> since any problem reported will lead to an error at runtime if
> a certain code path in the function is taken.

Shouldn't the validator just reject the function in those cases?