Horton

Re: Bug in to_timestamp().

amulsul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Alex Ignatov <a.ignatov@postgrespro.ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-08-19T04:53:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Friday, August 19, 2016 12:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:35 AM, amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
>
>> Hmm. I haven't really looked into the code, but with applying both patches it looks precisely imitate Oracle's behaviour. Thanks.
>
>
>This is good to hear, but for us to consider applying something like
>this, somebody would need to look into the code pretty deeply.

Sure Robert, Im planning to start initial review until next week at the earliest. Thanks


Regards,
Amul Sul

Commits

  1. Improve behavior of to_timestamp()/to_date() functions

  2. Implement TZH and TZM timestamp format patterns

  3. as attache of this mail is patch (to the main tree) with to_char's