Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-23T14:38:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes: > As for having plpgsql installed by default, are there any security > implications? Well, that's pretty much exactly the question --- are there? It would certainly make it easier for someone to exploit any other security weakness they might find. I believe plain SQL plus SQL functions is Turing-complete, but that doesn't mean it's easy or fast to write loops etc in it. regards, tom lane