Re: PL/pgSQL return value in after triggers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-01-02T04:37:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- plpgsql-trigger-return.patch (text/x-patch) patch
On mån, 2011-02-28 at 19:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > PL/pgSQL trigger functions currently require a value to be returned, > even though that value is not used for anything in case of a trigger > fired AFTER. I was wondering if we could relax that. It would make > things a bit more robust and produce clearer PL/pgSQL code. The > specific case I'm concerned about is that a trigger function could > accidentally be run in a BEFORE trigger even though it was not meant for > that. It is common practice that trigger functions for AFTER triggers > return NULL, which would have unpleasant effects if used in a BEFORE > trigger. > > I think it is very uncommon to have the same function usable for BEFORE > and AFTER triggers, so it would be valuable to have coding support > specifically for AFTER triggers. We could just allow RETURN without > argument, or perhaps no RETURN at all. Here is a patch for that. One thing that I'm concerned about with this is that it treats a plain RETURN in a BEFORE trigger as RETURN NULL, whereas arguably it should be an error. I haven't found a good way to handle that yet, but I'll keep looking.