Re: Compatible defaults for LEAD/LAG
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-04T21:12:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > út 22. 9. 2020 v 2:33 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal: >> Anyway, attached find >> 0001 - updates Vik's original patch to HEAD and tweaks the >> grammar in the docs a bit. >> 0002 - add-on patch to convert array_append, array_prepend, >> array_cat, array_position, array_positions, array_remove, >> array_replace, and width_bucket to use anycompatiblearray. >> I think 0001 is committable, but 0002 is just WIP since >> I didn't touch the docs. I'm slightly discouraged about >> whether 0002 is worth proceeding with. Any thoughts? > I think so 0002 has sense - more than doc I miss related regress tests, but > it is partially covered by anycompatible tests I didn't see any need for particularly exhaustive testing, but I did add one new test for an operator and one for a function. Pushed with that and the necessary docs work. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
- 9e38c2bb5093 14.0 landed
-
Declare lead() and lag() using anycompatible not anyelement.
- 5c292e6b9043 14.0 landed