Horton

Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor

Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>

View thread
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-10-11T16:30:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a

On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 12:09 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> The cure seems worse than the disease.  What is so bad about '[]'?

OK, so we stick with the 3-argument form. Do we have a default for the
third argument, or do we scrap it to avoid confusion?

There were some fairly strong objections to using '[]' as the default or
having the default vary between types. So, the only real option
remaining, if we do have a default, is '[)'.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis