Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-10-10T17:41:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a
- 7f3bd86843e5 9.2.0 cited
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 19:22 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote: > I still think we should strive for consistency here, so let's also make > '[]' the default flags for the range constructors. For continuous ranges I don't think that's a good idea. Closed-open is a very widely-accepted convention and there are good reasons for it -- for instance, it's good for specifying contiguous-but-non-overlapping ranges. So, I think we either need to standardize on '[)' or allow different default_flags for different types. Or, always specify the inclusivity in the constructor (hopefully in a convenient way). Regards, Jeff Davis