Re: Suggestions for improving \conninfo output in v18
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-06-13T04:32:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:05 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> > wrote: >> Therefore I see this as fixing an oversight in commit bba2fbc6238, so I'd >> like to commit the 0001 patch as well in v18. Thought? > You should get the concurrence of the RMT. > ... > Also, I was under the impression that updating relevant documentation for > a feature wasn't even subject to RMT review; FWIW, I agree with David's view of both of these points. RMT review of 0001 should be a formality here, but nonetheless we should adhere to process. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
doc: Add note about "Client User" and "Superuser" fields in \conninfo output.
- 0fe50417eca4 18.0 landed
-
psql: Report full protocol version in \conninfo output.
- be37ac20fc23 18.0 landed
-
Change \conninfo to use tabular format
- bba2fbc6238b 18.0 cited