Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Cc: Alexey Kluykin <alexk@commandprompt.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-07-14T01:38:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Florian Pflug's message of mié jul 13 20:12:28 -0400 2011: > On Jul14, 2011, at 01:38 , Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > One strange thing here is that you could get two such messages; say if a > > file has 100 parse errors and there are also valid lines that contain > > bogus settings (foo = bar). I don't find this to be too problematic, > > and I think fixing it would be excessively annoying. > > > > For example, a bogus run would end like this: > > > > 95 LOG: syntax error in file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" line 4, near end of line > > 96 LOG: syntax error in file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" line 41, near end of line > > 97 LOG: syntax error in file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" line 104, near end of line > > 98 LOG: syntax error in file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" line 156, near end of line > > 99 LOG: syntax error in file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" line 208, near end of line > > 100 LOG: syntax error in file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" line 260, near end of line > > 101 LOG: too many errors found, stopped processing file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" > > 102 LOG: unrecognized configuration parameter "plperl.err" > > 103 LOG: unrecognized configuration parameter "this1" > > 104 LOG: too many errors found, stopped processing file "/pgsql/install/HEAD/data/postgresql.conf" > > 105 FATAL: errors detected while parsing configuration files > > How about changing ParseConfigFile to say "too many *syntax* error found" > instead? It'd be more precise, and we wouldn't emit exactly the > same message twice. Yeah, I thought about doing it that way but refrained because it'd be one more string to translate. That's a poor reason, I admit :-) I'll change it. > Do you want me to take a closer look at your modified version of the > patch before you commit, or did you post it more as a "FYI, this is > how it's going to look like"? I know I'd feel more comfortable if you (and Alexey, and Selena) gave it another look :-) -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support