Re: application of KNN code to US zipcode searches?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Stosberg <mark@summersault.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-17T19:17:17Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Mark Stosberg <mark@summersault.com> writes:
> - The query planner didn't like it when the "ORDER BY" referred to a
>   column value instead of a static value, even when I believe it should
>   know that the column value never changes. See this pseudo-query where
>   we look-up the coordinates for 90210 once:

>   EXPLAIN ANALYZE
>   SELECT pets.pet_id,
>       zipcodes.lon_lat <-> center.lon_lat AS radius
>       FROM (SELECT lon_lat FROM zipcodes WHERE zipcode = '90210') AS
> center, pets
>       JOIN shelters USING (shelter_id)
>       JOIN zipcodes USING (zipcode)
>        ORDER BY postal_codes.lon_lat <-> center.lon_lat limit 1000;

As phrased, that's a join condition, so there's no way that an index on
a single table can possibly satisfy it.  You could probably convert it
to a sub-select though:

       ORDER BY postal_codes.lon_lat <-> (SELECT lon_lat FROM zipcodes WHERE zipcode = '90210') limit 1000;

			regards, tom lane