Re: SYNONYMS (again)
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-22T22:52:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of mié jun 22 15:37:17 -0400 2011: > Per: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg02043.php > > It seems we did come up with a use case in the procpid discussion. The > ability to change the names of columns/databases etc, to handle the > fixing of bad decision decisions during development over time. > > Thoughts? Let's start with what was discussed and supported in that thread, that is, databases. It seems less clear that columns are widely believed to be a good idea to have synonyms for. Besides, synonyms for databases should be reasonably simple to implement, which is not something I would say for columns. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support