Horton

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

View thread
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg@alleroedderne.adsl.dk>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2011-05-31T16:59:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar may 31 12:41:59 -0400 2011:
> Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com> wrote:
>  
> > I assume a link such as
> > 
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-12/msg00046.php
> > 
> > would be easier to follow than
> > 
> > <20031205173035.GA16741@wolff.to>
>  
> The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
> that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
>  
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20031205173035.GA16741@wolff.to

Yeah, I keep dreaming that one day we will get rid of the silly monthly
partitioning of archives.  Those URLs will eventually be legacy --
existing ones will continue to work, but new messages will not (may not)
get them any longer.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support