Re: Why is parula failing?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-02T00:11:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 09:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... in connection with which, I can't help noticing that parula
>> is using a very old compiler:
>> configure: using compiler=gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-17)
>> I wonder why parula is using that when its underlying system seems
>> markedly newer (the kernel at least has a recent build date).

> It could be, but wouldn't the bug have to relate to the locking code
> and be caused by some other backend stomping on the memory?
> Otherwise, shouldn't it be failing consistently every run rather than
> sporadically?

Your guess is as good as mine ... but we still haven't seen this
class of failure on any other animal, so the idea that it's strictly
a chance timing issue is getting weaker all the time.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"

  2. Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test

  3. Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables