Re: creating index names automatically?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-12-23T21:15:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Dec 23, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Uh ... I don't see what that fixes? If CONCURRENTLY can be a column >> name this is still ambiguous. > How? Because CONCURRENTLY can still be reduced as tricky_index_name, so it still doesn't know how to parse CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON ... regards, tom lane