Horton

Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d.ivanov@postgrespro.ru>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2016-12-23T17:30:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Do you have any particular objection to taking the next step of removing
>> enum InhOption in favor of making inhOpt a bool?

> No, not really.  I don't feel like it's an improvement, but you and
> Alvaro obviously do, so have at it.

OK, will do.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Replace enum InhOption with simple boolean.

  2. Remove sql_inheritance GUC.