Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-07-03T21:41:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Thanks for the review, new version attached.

This is marked as Ready for Committer, but that seems unduly
optimistic.  The cfbot shows that it's failing on all platforms ---
and not in the same way on each, suggesting there are multiple
problems.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Tweak a bit the new TAP tests of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  2. Rework logic and simplify syntax of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  3. Add more tests for REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM with relfilenode changes