Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-07-03T21:41:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Thanks for the review, new version attached. This is marked as Ready for Committer, but that seems unduly optimistic. The cfbot shows that it's failing on all platforms --- and not in the same way on each, suggesting there are multiple problems. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Tweak a bit the new TAP tests of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM
- 2b99ce10c2bc 16.0 landed
-
Rework logic and simplify syntax of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM
- 2cbc3c17a5c1 16.0 landed
-
Add more tests for REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM with relfilenode changes
- 5fb5b6c4c176 16.0 landed