Re: bugs - lets call an exterminator!
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-08-22T03:30:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes: > Needs > easy reporting of bugs - sent to bugs list > easy lookup of previous bugs > summary of fix or workaround > detail of fix or work around > little to no intervention of > developers > ability of developer to add > comments > That should sum it up. Check. > We've had a couple of volunteers to keep the database up to date. > Is it enough? I dunno, if I were to guess I'd have to look at > previous experience and say probably not. AFAIR, we had *zero* people paying any attention to the state of the bug database up to now. A couple of people ought to make a big difference. > Is implementing yet another bugtool going to be the solution? > Probably not. Do I want to go for number six? No. If you're the man maintaining it then I'm certainly not going to tell you how to do your job. OTOH --- it does seem like a lot of people like Bugzilla. Might be worth at least a cursory look. > Here's what I propose. > The current tool has a form - we keep it. > The current tool mails to the bugs list - we keep it. Those are both fine. How do we get feedback in the other direction, ie mailing lists to bug database? That's the $64 question in my mind at the moment. regards, tom lane