Re: 10.0
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2016-05-15T02:59:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes: > I think moving to a two-number format is a mistake: what exactly will > PQserverVersion() return in that case? For, say, 10.2 it would be 100002, equivalent to 10.0.2 under old style. We could redefine it as being major plus four-digit minor, really. Under the current maintenance scheme we never get anywhere near minor release 99 before a branch dies ... but having some more breathing room there would not be a bad thing. regards, tom lane