Re: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch

Marten Feldtmann <m.feldtmann@t-online.de>

From: M.Feldtmann@t-online.de (Marten Feldtmann)

To: "Chris Bitmead" <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>

Cc: "Chris Bitmead" <chris@bitmead.com>, "pgsql-patches@postgresql.org" <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>, "Postgres Hackers List" <hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2000-06-26T18:39:19Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:24:56 +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:

>
>I was thinking this myself today. Mainly because I wonder if in the
>future there may be support for more than one table implementing a
>particular class type. On the other hand the oid is a reference to the

 Which is very common in wrapper software technology ! Normally only
the first implementation is done this way: one class - one table. But
this is only a very naive design decision. Then when the performance 
lacks hierarchy tree are converted into one table ... etc

 Just my thoughts about something like this ....

 Marten

Marten Feldtmann, Germany