Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections

that's a really cool idea.  I think I'll try that.

On Wed, 3 June 1998, at 18:46:02, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> postmaster starts up to listen for connections, and then starts up its own
> backend to handle database queries?  So, on a quiet system, you would have
> two processes running, one postmaster, and one postgres...
> 
> basically, the idea is that postmaster can't talk to a table, only
> postgres can...so, setup postmaster the same way that any other interface
> is setup...connect to a backend and pass its transactions through that
> way...